National BlogNA BlogContactLog in
  • NA Blog
  • Contact

National Assembly Blog and News

  • Front Page
  • Categories
  • Archives
  • Latest comments
  • « Colorado 9 website
  • Dunleavy Issues Administrative Order Precluding Alaska Vaccine Passports »

Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)

Posted by admin on May 03, 2021 in Uncategorized
Opinions

  • Syllabus
  • Case

Primary Holding

Since federal common law is invalid, federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction should apply substantive state law and federal procedural law, unless there is a conflict between substantive state and federal law.

U.S. Supreme Court

Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)

Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins

No. 367

Argued January 31, 1938

Decided April 25, 1938

304 U.S. 64

 

Syllabus

1. The liability of a railroad company for injury caused by negligent operation of its train to a pedestrian on a much-used, beaten path on its right-of-way along and near the rails depends, in the absence of a federal or state statute, upon the unwritten law of the State where the accident occurred. Pp. 304 U. S. 71 et seq.

2. A federal court exercising jurisdiction over such a case on the ground of diversity of citizenship, is not free to treat this question as one of so-called "general law," but must apply the state law as declared by the highest state court. Swift v. Tyson, 16 Pet. 1, overruled. Id.

3. There is no federal general common law. Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common law applicable in a State whether they be local in their nature or "general," whether they be commercial law or a part of the law of torts. And no clause in the Constitution purports to confer such a power upon the federal courts. Except in matters governed by the Federal Constitution or by Acts of Congress, the law to be applied in any case is the law of the State. And whether the law of the State shall be declared by its legislature in a statute or by its highest court in a decision is not a matter of federal concern. P. 304 U. S. 78.

4. In disapproving the doctrine of Swift v. Tyson, the Court does not hold unconstitutional § 34 of the Federal Judiciary Act of 1789 or any other Act of Congress. It merely declares that, by applying the doctrine of that case, rights which are reserved by the Constitution to the several States have been invaded. P. 304 U. S. 79.

90 F.2d 603, reversed.

Page 304 U. S. 65

 

CERTIORARI, 302 U.S. 671, to review the affirmance of a judgment recovered against the railroad company in an action for personal injuries. The accident was in Pennsylvania. The action was in New York, jurisdiction being based on diversity of citizenship

Page 304 U. S. 69

Source: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/304/64/

No feedback yet


Form is loading...

Requested widget container sidebar_single does not exist for current collection #1 and skin type normal!

Search

Recent Posts

  • South Carolina Public Notice
  • Cook County Illinois Settlement Notice
  • Lake County, Illinois Settlement Notice
  • Illinois General Jural Assembly Public Notice
  • Oregon General Jural Assembly Public Notice
  • Georgia General Jural Assembly Public Notice
  • Arkansas General Jural Assembly Public Notice
  • North Carolina Public Notice
  • Florida General Jural Assembly Public Notice
  • Missouri General Jural Assembly Public Notice
  • Public Notice TGJA Formation
  • Hawaii General Jural Assembly Public Notice
  • Notice to Maui County - 6.29.21
  • Public Notice Kentucky General Jural Assembly
  • We THE People Present this Open Letter & Public Notice 8th October 2013
  • Declaration Of Contempt Of Constitution
  • Validation and Rebuttal Obama on Syria by MGJA
  • FBI raid on Homer couple inspires deafening silence from Alaska’s elected leaders
  • W.H.O. and C.D.C. – The New Nuremberg Trials 2021 [Crimes against humanity] – Please Share this info
  • The Problems With Status Change Documents Disclosed In Detail!
  • Colorado 9 website
  • Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)
  • Dunleavy Issues Administrative Order Precluding Alaska Vaccine Passports
  • 1st County settled in Tennessee State
  • Dunleavy tells feds Alaska is taking over management of 800,000 miles of river
  • New Blog!

This collection ©2025 by Billy Rights • Contact • Help • evoCore

powered by an open-source CMS

Cookies are required to enable core site functionality.